Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 overall score. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is newer, but way heavier and just a bit thicker than Google Pixel 3a. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with way more megapixels.
Galaxy A52 5G features a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.