Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Google Pixel 4, getting a general score of 91.3 against 81.9. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone than Google Pixel 4, but it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy A52 5G features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.