Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Google Pixel 4a, having a general score of 91.3 against 82.9. These devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11. Even being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a much heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Google Pixel 4a.
The Galaxy A52 5G and the Google Pixel 4a both have quite similar CPUs, both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.