Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, with a 91.3 score against 87.5. Even being the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11 version, giving you some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.