Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| -- | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a bit better than the Google Pixel 5, getting a 91.3 score against 89. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is just a bit thicker and notably heavier than the Google Pixel 5. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G features a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.