Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than Honor 50 Pro's general score of 77. Galaxy A52 5G is an a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than Honor 50 Pro. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11, counting with lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
Honor 50 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Honor 50 Pro has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, a little bit better pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels.
The Galaxy A52 5G and the Honor 50 Pro count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Honor 50 Pro has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit longer battery duration than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.