Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than HTC One M9, having a general score of 91.3 against 77.7. Galaxy A52 5G is a way newer and somewhat thinner phone than HTC One M9, although it's also heavier. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
HTC One M9 features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little better quantity of pixels in each display inch. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger aperture, a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.