Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. The Galaxy A52 5G is a a lot newer cellphone than HTC U Ultra, although it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The HTC U Ultra features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better display pixels density. The Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50% more battery size. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.