Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than the HTC U11's 77.6 global score. Even though Galaxy A52 5G is incredibly newer than the HTC U11, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The HTC U11 has just a little better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
HTC U11 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better memory for games and applications than HTC U11, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a really longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots way better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.