Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2023-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.56 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Coffee Black and Snow White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SM7450-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 644 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than the HTC U23 Pro, getting a score of 91.3 against 77.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and HTC U23 Pro has Android 13 version. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is a little thinner and a bit lighter than the HTC U23 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater processing power than HTC U23 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes a lot better photos and videos than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a lot less megapixels back-facing camera. Galaxy A52 5G features a better storage to install applications and games than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
HTC U23 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.