Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-03-19 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than LG G5, getting a score of 91.3 against 76.1. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is way newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than the LG G5. The LG G5 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater display density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than LG G5, because it has more RAM and more 2200 megahertz cores. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than LG G5, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a camera with much more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG G5, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A52 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than LG G5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.