Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than LG G7 Fit, with a 91.3 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone than LG G7 Fit, but it is heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
LG G7 Fit has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a higher display density. Galaxy A52 5G features a much better memory for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit faster processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster). Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much larger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos, a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.