Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the LG G7 ThinQ, getting a 91.3 score against 81. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone than LG G7 ThinQ, but it is a little bit thicker and heavier. These devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much better videos and photos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos and a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with slightly more memory to store more apps and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.