Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is slightly better than LG G8 ThinQ's 84.3 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat heavier device than the LG G8 ThinQ, but both have the same thickness. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while LG G8 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G8 ThinQ has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in low light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features greater battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.