Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 overall score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version. Galaxy A52 5G is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the LG G8X ThinQ, but they are equally thin.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a bit worse display density, a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
LG G8X ThinQ features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.