Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Titanium and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the LG K61, having a score of 91.3 against 77.6. Galaxy A52 5G's body has the same thickness than LG K61, but it's a bit lighter. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version while LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG K61 and Galaxy A52 5G both have incredibly similar processing units, and although the LG K61 has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. LG K61 counts with a screen that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's screen, and although the LG K61 has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit worse pixels density, they both have a display of the same size.
The LG K61 counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG K61 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior camera than LG K61, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K61, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.