Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| -- | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than LG K92, getting a 91.3 score against 85.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version. Galaxy A52 5G's construction has the same thickness than LG K92, but it is a bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a little bit better pixels density. LG K92 has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better processing power than LG K92. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, a 64 megapixels back-facing camera, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better battery life than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.