Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than the LG Q70's global score of 77.9. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is just a little bit thicker than LG Q70, it's just a little lighter and newer. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and increased performance.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better screen than LG Q70, because it has a bit larger display, a just a bit better pixel amount per inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photographs and videos than LG Q70, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG Q70, because although it has a SD card slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit longer battery performance than LG Q70, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.