Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the LG V10, with a global score of 91.3 against 78.6. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is a lot newer, just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the LG V10. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, so it provides some additional features.
LG V10 features a much better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels density. The Galaxy A52 5G has a better processing power than LG V10, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V10, because although it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior battery performance than LG V10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy A52 5G takes better videos and photos than LG V10, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.