Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the LG V30S ThinQ, having a 91.3 score against 82.5. The Galaxy A52 5G design is way newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A52 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a greater display pixels density.
LG V30S ThinQ features more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features greater battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.