Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. The Galaxy A52 5G body is a lot newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater display density. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.