Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than LG V40 ThinQ, having a score of 91.3 against 81.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, but it's heavier and a little thicker.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy A52 5G has slightly more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A52 5G counts with superior battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.