Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| -- | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is a little bit better than LG V60 ThinQ's 87.6 score. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version, providing the user some additional features. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than LG V60 ThinQ.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a screen that's just as good as the Galaxy A52 5G one, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V60 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots much better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have a back-facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate, a F1.8 camera aperture and a same size sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.