Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a bit better than the LG Velvet, getting a 91.3 score against 87.1. Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer than LG Velvet's, but it's a little thicker and a bit heavier. LG Velvet counts with a screen that is just as good as Galaxy A52 5G's screen, because although the LG Velvet has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little larger display.
The LG Velvet has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot more mega pixels camera and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
LG Velvet counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.