Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than LG Wing, having a 91.3 score against 91.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and the LG Wing were released with only a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is incredibly thinner and way lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while LG Wing has Android 10 version.
Galaxy A52 5G and LG Wing both count with very similar screens, because although the LG Wing has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px. LG Wing features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG Wing counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little longer battery lifetime than LG Wing, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The LG Wing counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same sensor size, the same video quality, a same size aperture and the same resolution camera, the LG Wing also has better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.