Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than Motorola edge, having a overall score of 91.3 against 89.6. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Motorola edge has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and enhanced performance. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is newer and thinner than Motorola edge's, although it's also a little heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little greater count of pixels per screen inch. Motorola edge features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola edge counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola edge features a camera that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's camera, they have the same resolution camera, the same back camera sensor size, the same video frame rate, the same aperture and the same video definition.
Motorola edge and Galaxy A52 5G feature really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.