Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, getting a 91.3 score against 87.1. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11 version. The Galaxy A52 5G is better than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, we must tell that it's also a bit heavier and just a little thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back and faster video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.