Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, having a 92.8 score against 91.3. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 12 OS. Although Motorola Edge 20 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G were released only 5 months apart, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro design is a bit thinner but also just a little heavier.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Edge 20 Pro and Galaxy A52 5G have quite similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.