Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 global score. Despite being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a much older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier device than the Motorola Edge (2024). These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy A52 5G has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Edge (2024) has a little better battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a tinier camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.