Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a score of 91.3 against 78.5. Both of these devices include the same Android 12 OS, so both of them should provide the same operating system features. Although the Galaxy A52 5G is a better phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, we must highlight that it's also older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G. Both have a display of the same size, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px and the same screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 2% larger battery size. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a camera with much less megapixels, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a larger camera sensor and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.