Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| -- | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a 91.3 score against 80.9. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 12 OS. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little lighter cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but both of them have the same thickness. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography, it also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.