Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than Motorola Edge 40's score of 77.2. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version. The Galaxy A52 5G design is way older, heavier and a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 40.
Motorola Edge 40 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch, a screen of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features much more storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A52 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low light situations and a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.