Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a overall score of 91.3 against 77. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing, it must be told that it is also a notably older, somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, a screen with the same size and a greater pixel quantity in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.