Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's overall score of 83.4. The Galaxy A52 5G is an way older phone than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it is just a little thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit worse screen density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality photographs.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 2 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.