Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, getting a global score of 91.3 against 81.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, we must note that it is also an extremely older, a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a little bit more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.