Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a 91.3 score against 86.3. Even being the best in this review, we must highlight that it is also a lot older, a little thicker and a little bit heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a quite bigger screen. Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor and a lot tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy A52 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.