Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 global score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Galaxy A52 5G's body is a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lot less MP back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a much bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a battery lifetime that is very similar to Galaxy A52 5G's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.