Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, with a general score of 91.3 against 81.5. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10. The Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G 5G, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference.
Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a quite higher screen density.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A52 5G features a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.