Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Surfing blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 general score. Even when Galaxy A52 5G and the Moto G 5G Plus were released with only 8 months difference, Galaxy A52 5G is a little thinner and a little bit lighter. The Galaxy A52 5G and the Moto G 5G Plus count with similar processors, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 5G and Moto G 5G Plus both feature similar screens, although the Moto G 5G Plus also has a just a little better amount of pixels per inch of display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Moto G 5G Plus has a little better battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.