Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than Moto G Power's 76.1 global score. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and a little lighter than Moto G Power. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and better performance.
Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a little bit better pixels number per inch in the display, a quite larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A52 5G features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G Power has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.