Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| -- | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than Moto G Power (2021)'s 76.5 global score. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Moto G Power (2021) were released only a few months apart, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is just a little lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a brighter display than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality, a larger sensor shooting better quality photographs and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.