Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than the Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 overall score. Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Moto G Stylus (2021), although both were released with only 2 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.