Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is way better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G design is a little bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it was released many years before. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bit better pixel density. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% more battery capacity. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much larger camera sensor, a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.