Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a little bit better than the Moto G100's score of 88.9. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Moto G100 has Android 11. Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat thinner and a bit lighter phone than the Moto G100, even when both were only released 1 months apart.
The Motorola Moto G100 has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2520px resolution, a quite larger screen and a little bit greater pixel density. The Moto G100's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to Galaxy A52 5G's one, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB and exactly the same internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G100 has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto G100 also has more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G100 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Motorola Moto G100 also counts with a much higher video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments.
Moto G100 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.