Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than Moto G200 5G, with a 91.3 score against 86.2. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Moto G200 5G has Android 11. Galaxy A52 5G is a a little lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than the Moto G200 5G, even when both were only released 8 months apart.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Moto G200 5G and Galaxy A52 5G both feature very similar displays, because although the Moto G200 5G has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better camera than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments. The Moto G200 5G counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.