Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Moto G51 5G, with a global score of 91.3 against 77.8. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is older than Moto G51 5G, it's design is a little lighter and a bit thinner. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version and Moto G51 5G has Android 11.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels per display inch. Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior memory for games and applications than Moto G51 5G, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy A52 5G takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with much more MP.
The Moto G51 5G counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.