Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| -- | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Motorola Moto G60, having a score of 91.3 against 79.5. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G60, although both were only released 1 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G60 has Android 11.
The Motorola Moto G60 counts with a processor that's just as good as the Galaxy A52 5G one, and although the Motorola Moto G60 has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better display than Moto G60, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density.
The Moto G60 and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G both count with really similar cameras, because although the Moto G60 has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera. Galaxy A52 5G has more storage to store more games and applications than Moto G60, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Moto G60 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.