Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Moto G7 Plus, with a score of 91.3 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a a little heavier phone than the Moto G7 Plus, but they are 0.33inches thick. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version.
Galaxy A52 5G features a little more vivid screen than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a greater pixel amount in each display inch, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite bigger display. Galaxy A52 5G has a little better performance than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior camera than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a much larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.