Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-03-19 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, with a 91.3 score against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is way newer than Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of 2200 MHz cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z Force features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.