Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. Galaxy A52 5G is a way newer cellphone than Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's a lot heavier and notably thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations, a lot larger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.